Why did Meta issue a prohibit call on its platform for assassination of high-ranking world leaders?

prohibit call

Recently, Meta introduced a new rule where it prohibit call for assassination of high-ranking global leaders. Meta (previously known as Facebook), the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, issued a reminder recently that it prohibits calls on its platforms for the assassination of high-ranking world leaders, following intense scrutiny of the company’s decision last week to relax hate speech policies in Ukraine.


Prohibit Call


Meta’s latest action on the prohibit calls reflects its seriousness regarding violation of policies. The prohibit calls are vital, according to Meta’s statement. In an internal post to employees, Meta President of Global Affairs Nick Clegg said “we do not permit calls to assassinate a head of state.” Russia opens a criminal case against Meta following temporary hate speech policy change. The internal post, which was reported by Bloomberg and Reuters and confirmed to CNN Business by a Meta spokesperson, does not mention Russian President Vladimir Putin by name. The spokesperson affirmed that the restrictions on calls for assassination apply globally.

Meta’s earlier decision allows Ukrainian users to post otherwise prohibited calls for violent self-defense or condemnation of Russia’s invasion and effectively created more leeway for users in the country to express support for violence on Meta’s platforms. (On Sunday, Mykhailo Fedorov, Ukraine’s Minister of Digital Transformation thanked Meta and said the decision “respect[ed] our right to counter the aggression” from Russia.)

But Meta was forced to clarify its stance after Russia accused it of facilitating “illegal calls for murder and violence” against Russian citizens and opened a criminal case against the company. Russia has separately moved to block Facebook and Instagram in the country as part of a crackdown on information about the war in Ukraine, though a growing number of Russian internet users appear determined to circumvent the ban.


Ukraine-Specific Policy


The Ukraine-specific policy on hate speech, which is temporary, is “focused on protecting people’s rights to speech as an expression of self-defense in reaction to a military invasion of their country,” Clegg said in a public statement Friday. The statement added that Meta has no quarrel with the Russian people and that “there is no change at all in our policies on hate speech as far as the Russian people are concerned.” Clegg’s internal post on Sunday doubled down on that position.

We are now narrowing the focus to make it explicitly clear in the guidance that it is never to be interpreted as condoning violence against Russians in general,” Clegg wrote, adding that the hate-speech carveout for Ukraine applies only to speech “regarding the Russian military invasion.”


Also Read: How can Personal Boundary by Meta enable Digital Privacy Protection?